Skip to content
Hearth & Code / independent studio research, making, and public record
Hearth & Code

Research, making, and a long way back into the work.

The Hearth / an independent studio

A hearth for the questions I keep coming back to.

Hearth & Code is my independent studio for research, systems work, and the long attempt to make a real place for questions that have mattered to me for years: questions about cognition, tools, learning, music, and why an idea can feel obvious one day and unreachable the next.

I did not arrive here through a neat institutional path. I am building the research practice I needed, slowly and in public, with enough structure to take the work seriously and enough room to follow an unexpected connection when it turns out to matter.

A place to begin

Some questions refuse to stay in their assigned room.

building in public

I have always been drawn to connections that did not seem to belong to the same category at first: computer science and psychology, research and making, code and music, structure and the sudden eureka of noticing that two ideas have been talking to each other all along. I could often see the route from one to another, and then lose weeks trying to find a form sturdy enough to carry all of it.

That is the practical reason for Hearth & Code. I want to do research carefully, with sources that can be checked and conclusions that can be challenged, and I also want the work to feel alive enough that the next surprising connection, rabbit hole, or small build can pull me back to the desk with genuine curiosity.

“I want the research to be serious enough to matter, and alive enough that I want to keep coming back to it.”

Shaped from Scott’s authoring material

The rooms

One hearth, several rooms, and each room gets to do its own work.

I do not want a visitor to read the same explanation eight times. Each room opens one door, then points toward the next question if they want to keep going.

Research

A question being worked on in public.

A self-directed attempt to build a research practice around cognitive scaffolds, returnability, and the stubborn question of how a person keeps complicated work alive long enough to learn from it.

Enter this room →

Exocore

The workbench taking shape.

A proposed local-first workbench, with one small public shell and a larger attempt to give difficult questions a room where they can stay open without disappearing from the map.

Enter this room →

Field Journal

The public record of the build.

Notes, design turns, and reflections for readers who want to follow the work as it changes. Read in time, or follow the connections between notes in the Field Map.

AI & Ethics

A personal position, kept revisable.

Working thoughts on authorship, judgment, collaboration, and the point where an AI system needs to hand the work back.

Enter this room →

Lab

Experiments with the edges still showing.

Open projects, adjacent interests, and small proofs that are still becoming what they are.

Enter this room →

Method

How the work stays honest.

The public/private boundary, research posture, and simple habits that make an evolving practice inspectable without pretending it is finished.

Enter this room →

Evidence Dossier

The person behind the work.

A field-file-shaped portfolio of background, current practice, open questions, and selected public evidence.

Enter this room →

For the curious

If your questions have ever outgrown the room they were supposed to fit inside, you are welcome here.

The work is for people who have watched their own ideas get stranded between fascination and follow-through, for builders who want to inspect the source, and for anyone interested in what a serious, unromanticized collaboration between a person and an AI might make possible.

Available now

  • Read the journalFollow the notes as the practice changes.
  • Inspect the sourceSee the public repositories and small working proofs.
  • Keep a questionTake the research question into your own work, with or without these tools.